Renewal of principles of aid effectiveness. The challenges for Spain from the point of view of evaluation principios para una ayuda eficaz y aplicaciones para las ONGD.
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 30, 2005
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyses the principles of aid effectiveness that have been renewed in the High Level Forum of the OECD, the so–called Paris Declaration (March 2005). The five principles are commented and critically analysed, indicating the main problems and challenges ahead, both for donor countries and partner countries. The analysis is developed both at macro (or country) level and micro level (or foreign aid projects and programmes). At the micro level, the main challenges for the NGO’s projects are described, especially in the field of evaluation.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Larrú Ramos, J. M. (2005). Renewal of principles of aid effectiveness. The challenges for Spain from the point of view of evaluation: principios para una ayuda eficaz y aplicaciones para las ONGD. Revista De Fomento Social, (238), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.32418/rfs.2005.238.2254
Section
Studies
The authors acknowledge that the Revista de Fomento Social assumes as its own the intellectual property rights over their work and grant the journal the permissions of distribution and public communication of the same established in the Berlin, Bethesda and Budapest declarations; for this reason they accept that the work presented be distributed in open access, protecting the copyright under a "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) license.
You may copy, use, disseminate, transmit and publicly display provided that:
Cite the authorship of the work, the publication in Revista de Fomento Social, issue, year and the pages where you found the information.
No commercial benefit may be obtained.
No derivative works may be made for commercial purposes that are not authorized by the journal.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate the article electronically (Revista de Fomento Social, number, year, pagination, ISSN, DOI, etc.), in order to favor its circulation and diffusion, increase its citation and reach among the academic community.
The information of the journal will be provided to Dulcinea
References
BHALLA, S., (2003), “Crying Wolf on Poverty: Or How the Millennium Development Goal for Poverty Has Already Been Reached”, Paper of the Institute for International Economics, Washington, http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/bhalla0403.pdf
BREIEROVA, L. & DUFLO, E., (2003), “The Impact of Education on Fertility and Child Mortality: Do Fathers Really Matter Less Than Mothers?”, Development Centre Working Paper 217.
CAD, (1991), The DAC Principles for the Evaluation of Development Assistance. Paris. OECD.
— (1996), Shaping the 21st Century: the Contribution of Development Co–operation. Paris. OECD.
— (1997), Searching for impact and methods: NGO Evaluation synthesis study. DAC Expert Group on Aid Evaluation. OEDC/DAC. Helsinki. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.
— (1998), Review of the DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development A ssistance. Paris. OECD.
— (2003), Harmonizing Donor Practices for Effective Aid Delivery. DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris. OECD–DAC.
CABEZAS, M. AND VOS, R., (2004), Illusions and Disillusions with Pro–poor Growth, La Haya. Institute of Social Studies.
CHAMBERS, R., (1994a), “Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of Experience”, World Development vol. 22, Nº 9, 1253–1268.
— (1994b), “Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Challenges, Potentials and Paradigm”, World Development vol.22, Nº 10, 1–17.
— (1997), Whose Reality Counts? Putting the first, last. London. Intermediate Technology Publications.
CHEN, S. y RAVALLION, M., (2001), “How Did the World’s Poorest Fare in the 1990s?”, Review of Income and Wealth 47, 283–300.
CLING, J. P., RAZAFINDRAKOTO, M. & ROUBAUD, F., (2002), “The PRSP Initiative: Old Wine in New Bottles?” ABCDE World Bank Conference. 24–26 june. Oslo.
CUESTA, J., (2004), “PRSP, ¿nuevas siglas o nuevas ideas en la lucha contra la pobreza?, Análisis del Real Instituto Elcano, 492. 28/4/2004.
— (2004b), Aprendiendo sobre la marcha: La experiencia de la estrategia de reducción de la pobreza en Honduras, La Haya, Institute of Social Studies.
DRISCOLL, R. & EVANS, A., (2004), “Second Generation Poverty Reduction Strategies”, London, ODI & DFID. www.prspsynthesis.org
DEATON, A., (2004), “Measuring Poverty”, in BANERJEE, A., BENABOU, R. & MOOKERJEE, D., (eds.), Poverty and Development in the World. Oxford University Press. http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~deaton/poverty.html
DRAZEN, A. & ISARD, P., (2004), “Can Public Discussion Enhance Program Ownership?”, IMF Working Paper 04/163.
DUFLO, E., (2001), “Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an Usual Policy Experiment”, American Economic Review 91 (4), 795–813.
— (2003), “Scaling up and Evaluation”, Paper prepared for the ABCDE in Bangalore. http://econ–www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=760
DUFLO, E. & KREMER, M., (2004), “Use of Randomization in the Evaluation of Development Effectiveness”, en PITMAN, FEINSTEIN & INGRAM, (eds.), Evaluating Development Effectiveness. World Bank Series on Evaluation and Development. Transaction Publishers. Chapter 10. Págs. 205–232.
FUENTES QUINTANA, E., (1993), “Tres decenios largos de la economía española en perspectiva”, en GARCÍA DELGADO, (coord.), España, Economía. Madrid, Espasa Calpe, págs, 1–140.
GONZÁLEZ PARADA, J. R. y GARCÍA CEBOLLA, J. C., (2004), Manual de Evaluación para la Cooperación Descentralizada. Madrid, Dykinson y FEMP.
GRUPO DE TRABAJO SOBRE LA EFICACIA DE LA AYUDA DEL CAD, (2005), “Aumentar Juntos la Eficacia de la Ayuda al Desarrollo. Armonización, Alineación, Resultados: Informe sobre Progreso, Retos y Oportunidades”.
HUTHER, J. & SHAH, A., (2000), “Anti–corruption Policies and Programs: A Framework for Evaluation”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2501.
IDA, (2004a), Measuring Results: Improving National Statistics in IDA Countries, Washington, International Development Association.
— (2004b), IDA Results Measurement System: Recommendations for IDA 14, Washington, International Development Association.
IMF – INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OFFICE, (2004), “Report on the Evaluation of Pov erty Reduction Strategy Papers, (PRSPs), and the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF)”, July 6, 2004.
INTERMÓN–OXFAM, (2004), ¿Cambio de timonel? Balance de los PRSP ante una segunda ronda, (resumen). Estudios de Oxfam Nº 51. Enero 2004.
KUSEK, J. Z., RIST, R. & WHITE, E., (2005), “How Will We Know The Millennium Development Goal Results When We See Them? Biulding a Results–Based Monitoring and Evaluation System to Give us the Answers”, Evaluation 11, 7–26.
LARRÚ, J. M., (2003a), “La eficacia de la ayuda al desarrollo. Una revisión al análisis macroeconómico y las evidencias empíricas”, Cooperación Internacional / International Cooperation 9, 87–101.
— (2003b), “La ayuda para los pobres funciona. La eficacia micro de la ayuda al desarrollo”, Revista de Economía Mundial 8, 97–117.
LUCAS, H., EVANS, D. & PASTEUR, K., (2004), “Research on the current state of PRS monitoring systems”, IDS Discussion Paper 382.
MAYOUX, L. & CHAMBERS, R., (2005), “Reversing the Paradigm: Quantification, Participatory Methods and Pro–Poor Impact Assessment”, Journal of International Development 17 (2), 271–298.
NACIONES UNIDAS, (2000), “Declaración del Milenio”, Resolución aprobada por la Asamblea General 55/2.
— (2002a), “Consenso de Monterrey”, Asamblea General de Naciones Unidas A/AC.257/L.13.
— (2002b), “Declaración sobre el Desarrollo Sostenible de Johannesburgo” A/CONF.199/L.6.
NARAYAN, D., (2000), La voz de los pobres. ¿Hay alguien que los escuche?, Madrid, Banco Mundial – Mundi_Prensa.
NARAYAN, D. ET AL., (2002), La Voz de los Pobres. Clamando por el cambio. Madrid, Banco Mundial y Mundi–Prensa.
NARAYAN, D. y PETESCH, P., (eds.), (2002), La Voz de los Pobres. Desde muchas tierras, Madrid, Banco Mundial y Mundi–Prensa.
OECD, (2005), 2004 Development Co–operation Report, Paris, OECD–DAC.
OECD–DAC, (2000), “Results Based Management in the Development Cooperation Agencies: A Review of Experience”, DAC Working Party on Aid Evaluation.
— (2004), “Joint Marrakech Memorandum. Managing for Development Results”, Second International Roundtable. 4–6 february, Marrakech.
— (2005), “Declaración de París sobre la Eficacia de la Ayuda al Desarrollo. Apropiación, Armonización, Alineación & Resultados y Mutua Responsabilidad”, París, Foro de Alto Nivel, 28–febrero–2 de marzo.
OPE, (2000), Programa de subvenciones y ayudas a ONGD en Haití, República Dominicana y Filipinas. Informes de evaluación 8/2000. Madrid, MAE–SECIPI.
OXFAM–INTERNATIONAL, (2004), “From ‘Donorship’ to Ownership? Moving Towards PRSP Round Two”, Oxfam Briefing Paper 51.
PNUD, (2004), La Democracia en América Latina. Hacia una democracia de ciudadanos y ciudadanas. Buenos Aires, Alfaguara.
RAVALLION, M., (2003), Have We Already Met the Millennium Development Goal for Poverty?, Institute for International Economics, Washington, http://www. iie.com/publications/papers/ravallion0203.pdf
REDDY, S. & POGGE, T., (2003), “How not to Count the Poor”, Unpublished paper, University of Columbia, http://www.columbia.edu/~sr793/count.pdf
ROCHE, C., (2004), Evaluación de impacto para agencias de desarrollo. Barcelona, Cuadernos de Cooperación de Intermón–Oxfam.
ROGERSON, A. & DE RENZIO, P., (2005), “The Seven Habits of Effective Aid: Best Practices, Challenges and Open Questions”, ODI Opinions 36.
SHAH, A. & SCHACTER, M., (2004), “Lucha contra la corrupción: Mire antes de dar el salto”, Finanzas y Desarrollo 41, (4), 40–43.
VOS, R., (coord.), (2003), “Reducir la pobreza: ¿se puede? Experiencias con las ERP en América Latina.” Informe Regional–2003 de la Evaluación y Monitoreo de las ERP en América Latina. La Haya, International Social Studies.
WHITE, H., (2004), “Using development goals and targets for donor agency performance measurement”, in R. BLACK & H. WHITE, (eds.), Targeting Development. Critical perspectives on the Millennium Development Goals. London, Routledge. Chapter 3.
— (2005), “Challenges in Evaluating Development Effectiveness”, IDS Working Paper 242.
WHITE, H. & BOOTH, D., (2004), “Using development goals to design country strategies”, in R. BLACK & H. WHITE, (eds.), Targeting Development. Critical perspectives on the Millennium Development Goals. London, Routledge. Chapter 4.
WORLD BANK, (2004), The Poverty Reduction Strategy Initiative. An Independent Evaluation of the World Bank’s Support Trough 2003. The World Bank. Washington.
— (2005), The Poverty Reduction Strategy Initiative. Findings from 10 Country Case Studies of World Bank and IMF Support. The World Bank. Washington.
BREIEROVA, L. & DUFLO, E., (2003), “The Impact of Education on Fertility and Child Mortality: Do Fathers Really Matter Less Than Mothers?”, Development Centre Working Paper 217.
CAD, (1991), The DAC Principles for the Evaluation of Development Assistance. Paris. OECD.
— (1996), Shaping the 21st Century: the Contribution of Development Co–operation. Paris. OECD.
— (1997), Searching for impact and methods: NGO Evaluation synthesis study. DAC Expert Group on Aid Evaluation. OEDC/DAC. Helsinki. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.
— (1998), Review of the DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development A ssistance. Paris. OECD.
— (2003), Harmonizing Donor Practices for Effective Aid Delivery. DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris. OECD–DAC.
CABEZAS, M. AND VOS, R., (2004), Illusions and Disillusions with Pro–poor Growth, La Haya. Institute of Social Studies.
CHAMBERS, R., (1994a), “Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of Experience”, World Development vol. 22, Nº 9, 1253–1268.
— (1994b), “Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Challenges, Potentials and Paradigm”, World Development vol.22, Nº 10, 1–17.
— (1997), Whose Reality Counts? Putting the first, last. London. Intermediate Technology Publications.
CHEN, S. y RAVALLION, M., (2001), “How Did the World’s Poorest Fare in the 1990s?”, Review of Income and Wealth 47, 283–300.
CLING, J. P., RAZAFINDRAKOTO, M. & ROUBAUD, F., (2002), “The PRSP Initiative: Old Wine in New Bottles?” ABCDE World Bank Conference. 24–26 june. Oslo.
CUESTA, J., (2004), “PRSP, ¿nuevas siglas o nuevas ideas en la lucha contra la pobreza?, Análisis del Real Instituto Elcano, 492. 28/4/2004.
— (2004b), Aprendiendo sobre la marcha: La experiencia de la estrategia de reducción de la pobreza en Honduras, La Haya, Institute of Social Studies.
DRISCOLL, R. & EVANS, A., (2004), “Second Generation Poverty Reduction Strategies”, London, ODI & DFID. www.prspsynthesis.org
DEATON, A., (2004), “Measuring Poverty”, in BANERJEE, A., BENABOU, R. & MOOKERJEE, D., (eds.), Poverty and Development in the World. Oxford University Press. http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~deaton/poverty.html
DRAZEN, A. & ISARD, P., (2004), “Can Public Discussion Enhance Program Ownership?”, IMF Working Paper 04/163.
DUFLO, E., (2001), “Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an Usual Policy Experiment”, American Economic Review 91 (4), 795–813.
— (2003), “Scaling up and Evaluation”, Paper prepared for the ABCDE in Bangalore. http://econ–www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=760
DUFLO, E. & KREMER, M., (2004), “Use of Randomization in the Evaluation of Development Effectiveness”, en PITMAN, FEINSTEIN & INGRAM, (eds.), Evaluating Development Effectiveness. World Bank Series on Evaluation and Development. Transaction Publishers. Chapter 10. Págs. 205–232.
FUENTES QUINTANA, E., (1993), “Tres decenios largos de la economía española en perspectiva”, en GARCÍA DELGADO, (coord.), España, Economía. Madrid, Espasa Calpe, págs, 1–140.
GONZÁLEZ PARADA, J. R. y GARCÍA CEBOLLA, J. C., (2004), Manual de Evaluación para la Cooperación Descentralizada. Madrid, Dykinson y FEMP.
GRUPO DE TRABAJO SOBRE LA EFICACIA DE LA AYUDA DEL CAD, (2005), “Aumentar Juntos la Eficacia de la Ayuda al Desarrollo. Armonización, Alineación, Resultados: Informe sobre Progreso, Retos y Oportunidades”.
HUTHER, J. & SHAH, A., (2000), “Anti–corruption Policies and Programs: A Framework for Evaluation”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2501.
IDA, (2004a), Measuring Results: Improving National Statistics in IDA Countries, Washington, International Development Association.
— (2004b), IDA Results Measurement System: Recommendations for IDA 14, Washington, International Development Association.
IMF – INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OFFICE, (2004), “Report on the Evaluation of Pov erty Reduction Strategy Papers, (PRSPs), and the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF)”, July 6, 2004.
INTERMÓN–OXFAM, (2004), ¿Cambio de timonel? Balance de los PRSP ante una segunda ronda, (resumen). Estudios de Oxfam Nº 51. Enero 2004.
KUSEK, J. Z., RIST, R. & WHITE, E., (2005), “How Will We Know The Millennium Development Goal Results When We See Them? Biulding a Results–Based Monitoring and Evaluation System to Give us the Answers”, Evaluation 11, 7–26.
LARRÚ, J. M., (2003a), “La eficacia de la ayuda al desarrollo. Una revisión al análisis macroeconómico y las evidencias empíricas”, Cooperación Internacional / International Cooperation 9, 87–101.
— (2003b), “La ayuda para los pobres funciona. La eficacia micro de la ayuda al desarrollo”, Revista de Economía Mundial 8, 97–117.
LUCAS, H., EVANS, D. & PASTEUR, K., (2004), “Research on the current state of PRS monitoring systems”, IDS Discussion Paper 382.
MAYOUX, L. & CHAMBERS, R., (2005), “Reversing the Paradigm: Quantification, Participatory Methods and Pro–Poor Impact Assessment”, Journal of International Development 17 (2), 271–298.
NACIONES UNIDAS, (2000), “Declaración del Milenio”, Resolución aprobada por la Asamblea General 55/2.
— (2002a), “Consenso de Monterrey”, Asamblea General de Naciones Unidas A/AC.257/L.13.
— (2002b), “Declaración sobre el Desarrollo Sostenible de Johannesburgo” A/CONF.199/L.6.
NARAYAN, D., (2000), La voz de los pobres. ¿Hay alguien que los escuche?, Madrid, Banco Mundial – Mundi_Prensa.
NARAYAN, D. ET AL., (2002), La Voz de los Pobres. Clamando por el cambio. Madrid, Banco Mundial y Mundi–Prensa.
NARAYAN, D. y PETESCH, P., (eds.), (2002), La Voz de los Pobres. Desde muchas tierras, Madrid, Banco Mundial y Mundi–Prensa.
OECD, (2005), 2004 Development Co–operation Report, Paris, OECD–DAC.
OECD–DAC, (2000), “Results Based Management in the Development Cooperation Agencies: A Review of Experience”, DAC Working Party on Aid Evaluation.
— (2004), “Joint Marrakech Memorandum. Managing for Development Results”, Second International Roundtable. 4–6 february, Marrakech.
— (2005), “Declaración de París sobre la Eficacia de la Ayuda al Desarrollo. Apropiación, Armonización, Alineación & Resultados y Mutua Responsabilidad”, París, Foro de Alto Nivel, 28–febrero–2 de marzo.
OPE, (2000), Programa de subvenciones y ayudas a ONGD en Haití, República Dominicana y Filipinas. Informes de evaluación 8/2000. Madrid, MAE–SECIPI.
OXFAM–INTERNATIONAL, (2004), “From ‘Donorship’ to Ownership? Moving Towards PRSP Round Two”, Oxfam Briefing Paper 51.
PNUD, (2004), La Democracia en América Latina. Hacia una democracia de ciudadanos y ciudadanas. Buenos Aires, Alfaguara.
RAVALLION, M., (2003), Have We Already Met the Millennium Development Goal for Poverty?, Institute for International Economics, Washington, http://www. iie.com/publications/papers/ravallion0203.pdf
REDDY, S. & POGGE, T., (2003), “How not to Count the Poor”, Unpublished paper, University of Columbia, http://www.columbia.edu/~sr793/count.pdf
ROCHE, C., (2004), Evaluación de impacto para agencias de desarrollo. Barcelona, Cuadernos de Cooperación de Intermón–Oxfam.
ROGERSON, A. & DE RENZIO, P., (2005), “The Seven Habits of Effective Aid: Best Practices, Challenges and Open Questions”, ODI Opinions 36.
SHAH, A. & SCHACTER, M., (2004), “Lucha contra la corrupción: Mire antes de dar el salto”, Finanzas y Desarrollo 41, (4), 40–43.
VOS, R., (coord.), (2003), “Reducir la pobreza: ¿se puede? Experiencias con las ERP en América Latina.” Informe Regional–2003 de la Evaluación y Monitoreo de las ERP en América Latina. La Haya, International Social Studies.
WHITE, H., (2004), “Using development goals and targets for donor agency performance measurement”, in R. BLACK & H. WHITE, (eds.), Targeting Development. Critical perspectives on the Millennium Development Goals. London, Routledge. Chapter 3.
— (2005), “Challenges in Evaluating Development Effectiveness”, IDS Working Paper 242.
WHITE, H. & BOOTH, D., (2004), “Using development goals to design country strategies”, in R. BLACK & H. WHITE, (eds.), Targeting Development. Critical perspectives on the Millennium Development Goals. London, Routledge. Chapter 4.
WORLD BANK, (2004), The Poverty Reduction Strategy Initiative. An Independent Evaluation of the World Bank’s Support Trough 2003. The World Bank. Washington.
— (2005), The Poverty Reduction Strategy Initiative. Findings from 10 Country Case Studies of World Bank and IMF Support. The World Bank. Washington.