Is it worth commemorating the 30th anniversary of "Populorum Progressio"?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The author does not merely seek to evoke a past event, such as the appearance of the encyclical Populorum Progressio, but rather to recover and update the most valuable contents of this document, considering today's new context: globalization as a backdrop; alongside it, the two phenomena that seem to have made it possible: the new technological revolution and the collapse of the collectivist system. These pages review the essential points of Populorum Progressio, especially highlighting those that have not lost their validity today, but rather have gained it. First, a summary of this encyclical is provided, followed by an analysis of its conclusions in the face of new circumstances. With its concept of integral and solidarity-based development, Paul VI's encyclical anticipated many subsequent efforts. The most significant of these focus on human development and sustainable development.
Downloads
Article Details
Previously, the journal was copyrighted. Now, since 2021, the journal publishes under the Creative Commons license.
Authors who publish in Proyección. Teología y Mundo Actual, accept the following conditions:
Authors retain copyright © and grant the journal the right of publication, under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) license.
You may copy, use, disseminate, transmit, and publicly display provided that:
* Cite authorship of the work, publication in Proyección. Teología y Mundo Actual, number, year and the pages where the information was found.
* No commercial benefit may be obtained.
* No derivative works may be made for commercial purposes that are not authorized by the journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate the article electronically (Proyección. Teología y Mundo Actual, logo or cover of the journal, pagination, indication of the volume and number of the journal, ISSN, DOI, etc.), in order to favor its circulation and diffusion, and to increase its citation and reach among the academic community.
References
I. CAMACHO LARAÑA, “Ecos eclesiales de la Conferencia de El Cairo”: Proyección 41 (1994) 277-296.
“América Latina tras la “década perdida” (Un estudio basado en la interpretación neoestructuralista)”: Revista de Fomento Social 47 (1992) 465-493.
“Dimensión ética de las actividades financieras”: Revista de Fomento Social 51 (1996) 23-54.
R. ALBERDI, “Juicio político cristiano sobre el capitalismo”: Iglesia Viva (1967) 337-353.
A. L. MARZAL, “El nuevo humanismo”, en Comentarios de Cuadernos para el Diálogo a la “Popularum progresio”, Edicusa, Madrid 1967.
A. FONSECA, “Il ventennale della Populorum progressio”, Civiltá Cattolica 138/2 (1987) 446-457.
O. ALZAGA, “En torno a las transformaciones revolucionarias”, en Comentarios de Cuadernos para el Diálogo a la “Popularum progresio”, Edicusa, Madrid 1967.
G. HIGUERA, “¿Evolución o revolución?”, en: M. GARCÍA (ed), Teología y sociología del desarrollo. Comentario a la “Popularum progressio”, Razón y Fe, Madrid 1968, 209-228.
P. PAVAN, “Vers une autorité mondiale. Commentaire de l´encyclique Populorum Progressio”: Documentation Catholique 64 (1967) 723-728.
PROGRAMA DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA EL DESARROLLO (PNUD), Informe sobre el desarrollo humano 1996, Nueva York-Madrid 1996.
PROGRAMA DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA EL DESARROLLO (PNUD), Informe sobre el desarrollo humano 1997, Nueva York-Madrid 1996.
AA.VV., “¿Fuera del mercado no hay salvación?”: Concilium 270 (1997).
L. DE SEBASTIÁN, “El mercado: funciones y disfunciones sociales”: Sal Terrae 1003 (1997) 531-543.